《马克思主义基本原理》课程教学资源（文献资料）马克思恩格斯_共产党宣言（英文版）

[崔校平提供：偶得《共产党宣言》英语版，愿和大家共同分享，欢迎广大师生 学习或下载珍藏] Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1848 1 Bourgeois and Proletarian 2 Proletarians and Communists 3 Socialist and Communist Literature 4 Position of the Communists in relation to the various existing opposition parties A spectre is haunting Europe-the spectre of communism.All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar,Metternich and Guizot,French Radicals and German police-spies. Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communisti by its opponents in power?Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism,against the more advanced opposition parties,as well as against its reactionary adversaries? Two things result from this fact: I.Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power. Il It is high time that Communists should openly.in the face of the whole world,publish their views,their aims,their tendenc es and meet this nursery tale of the spectre of communism with a manifesto of the party itself. To this end,Communists of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched the following manifesto,to be published in the English, French,German,Italian,Flemish and Danish languages

[崔校平提供: 偶得《共产党宣言》英语版，愿和大家共同分享，欢迎广大师生 学习或下载珍藏] Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1848 1 Bourgeois and Proletarians 2 Proletarians and Communists 3 Socialist and Communist Literature 4 Position of the Communists in relation to the various existing opposition parties A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies. Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries? Two things result from this fact: I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power. II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the spectre of communism with a manifesto of the party itself. To this end, Communists of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages

I-BOURGEOIS AND PROLETARIANS The history of all hitherto existing society [al is the history of class struggles Freeman and slave,patrician and plebian,lord and serf,guild-master [3) and journeyman,in a word,oppressor and oppressed,stood in constant opposition to one another,carried on an uninterrupted,now hidden,now open fight a fight that each time ended,either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large,or in the common ruin of the contending classes. In the earlier epochs of history.we find almost everywhere a complicated otyinve mtrierans.its plobimns.slaves:in arranger manifold gradation of social rank.I ancient Rome we the Middle Ages,feudal lords,vassals,guild-masters,journeymen, apprentices,serfs:in almost all of these classes,again,subordinate gradations. The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms.It has but established new classes,new conditions of oppression,new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. Our epoch.the epoch of the bourgeoisie,poss ess s,however,this distinct feature:it has simplified class antagonisms.Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps,into two great classes directly facing each other -bourgeoisie and proletariat. From the serfs of the Middle Ages ng the chartered burghers of the earliest towns.From these burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed The discovery of America,the rounding of the Cape,opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie.The East-Indian and Chinese markets,the colonization of America, trade with the colo nies,the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally,gave to commerce,to navigation,to industry,an impulse never before known,and thereby,to the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society,a rapid development

I - BOURGEOIS AND PROLETARIANS [1] The history of all hitherto existing society [2] is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guild-master [3] and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes. In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations. The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other - bourgeoisie and proletariat. From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the earliest towns. From these burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed. The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and Chinese markets, the colonization of America, trade with the colonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave to commerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid development

The feudal system of industry in which industrial production was yclosed guilds, o longer suffices for the growing wants rkets.The mamufacturing systea tok its pace. now n guild-masters were pushed aside by the manufacturing middle class: division of labor between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of labor in each single workshop. Meantime,the markets kept ever growing,the demand ever rising.Even manufacturers no longer sufficed.Thereupon,steam and machinery revolutionized industrial production.The place of manufacture was taken by the giant,MODERN INDUSTRY;the place of the industrial middle class by industrial millionaires,the leaders of the whole industrial armies the modern bourgeois Modern industry has established the world market,for which the discovery of America paved the way.This market has given an immense development to commerce.to navigation.to communication by land.This development has,in turn,reacted on the extension of indust ry;and in proportion as industry,commerce,navigation,railways extended,in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed,increased its capital,and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages. We see,therefor how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development,of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange. Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance in that class.An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility an armed and self-governing associatio of medieval commune [4]:here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany):there taxable "third estate"of the monarchy (as in france): afterward,in the period of manufacturing proper,serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and,in fac corne of the onarchies in general the bourgeoisie has at last,since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world market,conquered for itself,in the modern representative state.exclusive political swav.The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie,historically,has played a most revolutionary part. The bourgeoisie,wherever it has got the upper hand,has put an end to all feudal,patriarchal,idyllic relations.It has pitilessly torn

The feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was monopolized by closed guilds, now no longer suffices for the growing wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system took its place. The guild-masters were pushed aside by the manufacturing middle class; division of labor between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of labor in each single workshop. Meantime, the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturers no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery revolutionized industrial production. The place of manufacture was taken by the giant, MODERN INDUSTRY; the place of the industrial middle class by industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeois. Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages. We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange. Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance in that class. An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and self-governing association of medieval commune [4]: here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany); there taxable "third estate" of the monarchy (as in France); afterward, in the period of manufacturing proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in fact, cornerstone of the great monarchies in general - the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative state, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part. The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn

asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors", dhas ethbt nked senterest h callous It has drowned out the most heavenly ecstacies of religious fervor,of chivalrous enthusiasm,of philistine sentimentalism.in the icy water of egotistical calculation.It has resolved personal worth into exchange value,and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedom has set up that single sc onable freedom ree Trade In one for exploit veiled by religious and political illusions,it has substituted naked shameless,direct,brutal exploitation. The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe.It has converted the physician, the lawyer,the priest,the poet,the man of science,into its paid wage laborers. The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil.and has reduced the family relation into a mere money relation The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigor in the Middle Ages,which reactionaries so much admire,found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence.It has been the first to show what man's activity can bring about.It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids Roma aque ucts d Gothi cathedrals;it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former exoduses of nations and crusades. The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the nts of production, and thereby the relations of production, with them the whole relations of society.Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form,was,on the contrary,the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes.Constant revolutionizing of production,uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earli er ones All fixed,fast frozen relations,ith their trai of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions,are swept away,all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify.All that is solid melts into air,all that is holy is profaned,and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his kind. The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe.It must nestle everywhere,settle everywhere,establish connections everywhere

asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors", and has left no other nexus between people than naked self-interest, than callous "cash payment". It has drowned out the most heavenly ecstacies of religious fervor, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom - Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation. The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers. The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation into a mere money relation. The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigor in the Middle Ages, which reactionaries so much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence. It has been the first to show what man's activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former exoduses of nations and crusades. The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his kind. The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connections everywhere

The bourgeoisie has,through its exploitation of the world market,giver mopolitan character to production ar onsumption in every To the great chagrin of reactionaries,it has drawn from under the fee of industry the national ground on which it stood.All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed.They are dislodged by new industries,whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all c civilized nations by industries 。that no longe work up indigenous raw material,but raw material drawn from the remotest zones:industries whose products are consumed,not only at home,but in every quarter of the globe.In place of the old wants,satisfied by the production of the country.we find new wants.requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes.In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency we have intercourse in every direction,universal inter-dependence of nations And as in material,so also in intellectual production.The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property.National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible.and rous national and local literatures,there arises a world The bourgeoisie,by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production by the immensely facilitated means of communication,draws all,even the most barbarian. nations into civilization.The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it forces the barbarians intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate.It compels all nations,on pain of extinction,to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e.,to become bourgeois themselves.In one word,it creates a world after its image The bourgeoisie has subiected the country to the rule of the towns.It has created enormous cities,has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural,and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life. Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns,so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilized ones,nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois,the East on the West. The bourgeoisie keeps ore and more doing away with the scattered state of the population,of the means of production,and of property.It has agglomerated population,centralized the means of production,and has concentrated property in a few hands.The necessary consequence of this was political centralization.Independent,or but loosely connected

The bourgeoisie has, through its exploitation of the world market, given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of reactionaries, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilized nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature. The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilization. The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it forces the barbarians' intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image. The bourgeoisie has subjected the country to the rule of the towns. It has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life. Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns, so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilized ones, nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois, the East on the West. The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property. It has agglomerated population, centralized the means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands. The necessary consequence of this was political centralization. Independent, or but loosely connected

provinces,with separate interests.laws,governments.and systems of taxation, one code of la ws,one national one customs tariff. The bourgeoisie,during its rule of scarce one hundred years,has created more massive and more than have all preeding ons together. Subjection of nture forces to m machinery application of chemistry to industry and agriculture,steam navigation, railwavs,electric telegraphs,clearing of whole continents for cultivation,canalization or rivers,whole populations conjured out of the ground-what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labor? We see then:the means of production and of exchange,on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up,were generated in feudal society.At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange,the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged,the feudal rganization of agriculture and manufacturing industry,in one word,the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces;they became so many fetters.They had to be burst asunder:they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped fre ompetition accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it,and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eves.Modern bourgeois society,with its relations of production,of exchange and of proper a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange,is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.For many a decade past,the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production against the property rel tha are the conditions for the exister of the bourgeois and of its rule.It is enough to mention the commercial crises that,by their periodical return,put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial.each time more threateningly.In these crises,a great part not only of the existing products,but also of the eviously productive forces odically des royed.In these crises,there breaks out an epidemic that,in all earlier epochs would have seemed an absurdity-the epidemic of over-production.Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism;it appears as if a famine,a universal war of devastation,had cut off the

provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments, and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class interest, one frontier, and one customs tariff. The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of nature's forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalization or rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground - what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labor? We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organization of agriculture and manufacturing industry, in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. For many a decade past, the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeois and of its rule. It is enough to mention the commercial crises that, by their periodical return, put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity - the epidemic of over-production. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the

supply of every means of subsistence:industry and commerce seem to be sroyed.And y?Because there is too muchcivliaionoo of subsis too much industry too much productiv forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property:on the contrary,they have become too powerful for these conditions,by which they are fettered,and so soon as they overcome these fetters,they bring disorder into the whole of iety, of ho pr ty. The conditions c of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them.And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises?On the one hand,by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces:on the other.by the conquest of new markets.and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones.That is to say,by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises,and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented. The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself. But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself;it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons -the modern working class -the proletarians. In proportion as the bourgeoisie,i.e.,capital,is developed,in the same proportion is the proletariat,the modern working class,developed class of laborers,who live only so long as they find work,and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital.These laborers,who must sell themselves piecemeal,are a commodity,like every other article of commerce,and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition to all the fluctuations of the market Owing to the extensive use of machinery,and to the division of labor, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character,and, consequently,all charm for the workman.He becomes an appendage of the and it is o nly the most simple most monoton d m acquired knack,that is required of him.Hence,the cost of production of a workman is restricted,almost entirely,to the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance,and for the propagation of his race. But the price of a commodity,and therefore also of labor,is equal to its cost of production. .In propo rtion,therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases,the wage decreases. What is more,in proportior as the use of machinery and division of labor increases,in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases,whether by prolongation of

supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed. And why? Because there is too much civilization, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. The conditions of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them. And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand, by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. That is to say, by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises, and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented. The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself. But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons - the modern working class - the proletarians. In proportion as the bourgeoisie, i.e., capital, is developed, in the same proportion is the proletariat, the modern working class, developed - a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital. These laborers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market. Owing to the extensive use of machinery, and to the division of labor, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character, and, consequently, all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine, and it is only the most simple, most monotonous, and most easily acquired knack, that is required of him. Hence, the cost of production of a workman is restricted, almost entirely, to the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance, and for the propagation of his race. But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labor, is equal to its cost of production. In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases. What is more, in proportion as the use of machinery and division of labor increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases, whether by prolongation of

the working hours.by the increase of the work exacted in a given time or by increased speed of machinery,etc Modern Industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist.Masses of laborers,crowded into the factory,are organized like soldiers.As privates of the industrial army,they are pla ced under the c perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants.Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class,and of the bourgeois state;they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine,by the overlooker,and,above all,in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself.The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim,the more petty,the more hateful and the more embittering it is. The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labor,in other words,the more modern industry becomes developed,the more is the labor of men superseded by that of women.differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class.All are instruments of labor,more or less expensive to use,according to thei age and sex. No sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer,so far at an end.that he receives his wages in cash.than he is set upon by the other portion of the bourgeoisie,the landlord,the shopkeeper,the pawnbroker,etc The lower strata of the middle class -the small trades people, shopkeepers,and retired tradesmen generally,the handicraftsmen and all these sink gradually into the proletariat,partly becau their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on,and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists,partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production.Thus,the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population The proletariat goes through various stages of development.With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie.At first,the contest is carried on by individual laborers,then by the work of people of a factory,then by the operative of one trade.in one locality.against the individual who directly exploits them hey t their attacks not against the bourgeois condition of production,but against the instruments of production themselves;they destroy imported wares that compete with their labor,they smash to pieces machinery,they set

the working hours, by the increase of the work exacted in a given time, or by increased speed of machinery, etc. Modern Industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist. Masses of laborers, crowded into the factory, are organized like soldiers. As privates of the industrial army, they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself. The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim, the more petty, the more hateful and the more embittering it is. The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labor, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labor of men superseded by that of women. Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labor, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex. No sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer, so far at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portion of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc. The lower strata of the middle class - the small trades people, shopkeepers, and retired tradesmen generally, the handicraftsmen and peasants - all these sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on, and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production. Thus, the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population. The proletariat goes through various stages of development. With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie. At first, the contest is carried on by individual laborers, then by the work of people of a factory, then by the operative of one trade, in one locality, against the individual bourgeois who directly exploits them. They direct their attacks not against the bourgeois condition of production, but against the instruments of production themselves; they destroy imported wares that compete with their labor, they smash to pieces machinery, they set

factories ablaze,they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages. At this stage,the laborers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country,and broken up by their mutual competition.If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies,this is not yet the consequence of the active nion,but of the union of the bourgeoisie, in or attain its political the whole proletariat in motion,and is moreover yet,for a time,able to do so At this stage,therefore,the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies,the remnants of absolute monarchy,the landowners.the non-industrial bourgeois.the petty bourgeois.Thus,the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie But with the development of industry,the proletariat not only increases in number:it becomes concentrated in greater masses,its strength grows and it feels that strength more.The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and mo e equalized,in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labor,and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level.The growing competition among the bourgeois,and the resulting commercial crises,make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating.The increasing improvement of machinery,ever more rapidly developing,makes their livelihood more and more precarious:the collisions between individual workmen and individua bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes.Thereupon,the workers begin to form combinations(trade unions) against the bourgeois:they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages:they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts. Here and there,the contest breaks out into riots. Now and then the workers are victorious,but only for a time.The real fruit of their battles lie not in the immediate result.but in the ever expanding union of the workers.This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by Modern Industry,and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another.It was iust this contact that was needed to centralize the numerous local struggles,all of the same character,into one national struggle between classes.But every class struggle is a political struggle.And that union to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages,with their miserable highways,required centuries,the modern proletarian,thanks to railways, achieve in a few years

factories ablaze, they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages. At this stage, the laborers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country, and broken up by their mutual competition. If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies, this is not yet the consequence of their own active union, but of the union of the bourgeoisie, which class, in order to attain its own political ends, is compelled to set the whole proletariat in motion, and is moreover yet, for a time, able to do so. At this stage, therefore, the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies, the remnants of absolute monarchy, the landowners, the non-industrial bourgeois, the petty bourgeois. Thus, the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie. But with the development of industry, the proletariat not only increases in number; it becomes concentrated in greater masses, its strength grows, and it feels that strength more. The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and more equalized, in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labor, and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level. The growing competition among the bourgeois, and the resulting commercial crises, make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating. The increasing improvement of machinery, ever more rapidly developing, makes their livelihood more and more precarious; the collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes. Thereupon, the workers begin to form combinations (trade unions) against the bourgeois; they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages; they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts. Here and there, the contest breaks out into riots. Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time. The real fruit of their battles lie not in the immediate result, but in the ever expanding union of the workers. This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by Modern Industry, and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another. It was just this contact that was needed to centralize the numerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle between classes. But every class struggle is a political struggle. And that union, to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages, with their miserable highways, required centuries, the modern proletarian, thanks to railways, achieve in a few years

This organization of the proletarians into a class,and.consequently is continually being stronger,firmer,mightier.It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers,by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself.Thus.the Ten-Hours Bill in England was carried. Altogether,collisions between the classes of the old society further in many ways the course of development of the proletariat.The bourgeoisie finds itself involved in a constant battle.At first with the aristocracy: later on,with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself,whose interests have become antagonistic to the progre of industry;at all time with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries.In all these battles,it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat,to ask for help,and thus to drag it into the political arena.The bourgeoisie itself,therefore,supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words,it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie. Further,as we have already seen,entire sections of the ruling class are, by the advance of industry,precipitated into the proletariat,or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence.These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress Finally,in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour,the progress of dissolution going on within the ruling class,in fact within the whole range of old society,assumes such a violent,glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift and ioins the revolutionary class,the class that holds the future in its hands Just as,therefore,at an earlier period,a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie,so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat,and in particular,a portion of the bourgeois ideologists,who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a genuinely revolutionary class.The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry:the proletariat is its special and essential product. The lower middle class,the small manufacturer,the shopkeeper,the artisan,the peasant,all these fight against the bourgeoisie,to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.They

This organization of the proletarians into a class, and, consequently, into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves. But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself. Thus, the Ten-Hours Bill in England was carried. Altogether, collisions between the classes of the old society further in many ways the course of development of the proletariat. The bourgeoisie finds itself involved in a constant battle. At first with the aristocracy; later on, with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself, whose interests have become antagonistic to the progress of industry; at all time with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries. In all these battles, it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat, to ask for help, and thus to drag it into the political arena. The bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie. Further, as we have already seen, entire sections of the ruling class are, by the advance of industry, precipitated into the proletariat, or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence. These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress. Finally, in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour, the progress of dissolution going on within the ruling class, in fact within the whole range of old society, assumes such a violent, glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class, the class that holds the future in its hands. Just as, therefore, at an earlier period, a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie, so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeois ideologists, who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole. Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a genuinely revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product. The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They