《太空生物工程与生命支撑》（英文版）In the Wake of the astrolabe

In the Wake of the astrolabe Content Analysis of Diaries Maintained by the Leaders and physicians of French Remote duty stations Jack stuster PhD, CPE Anacapa Sciences, inc Santa Barbara, California

In the Wake of the Astrolabe: In the Wake of the Astrolabe: Content Analysis of Diaries Maintained by Content Analysis of Diaries Maintained by the Leaders and Physicians of the Leaders and Physicians of French Remote Duty S French Remote Duty Stations Jack Stuster Jack Stuster, PhD, CPE Anacapa Sciences, Inc. Anacapa Sciences, Inc. Santa Barbara, Califor Santa Barbara, Califor nia

Collaborators a Claude Bachelard, MD u Territoire des Terres Australes et Antarctiques FranAaises (TAAF), and Institut Fran Aaises Pour La Recherche Et La Technologie Polaires(IFRP) Peter Suedfeld. phd University of British Columbia

Collaborators � Claude Bachelard, M D � Territoi re des Terres Austr ales et Antarctiques FranÁ aise s (TAAF), a n d Institut FranÁ aises Pour La Rec herche Et La Techn ologie Polaires (IF RP) � Peter Suedfeld, Ph D � University of British Colum bia Collaborators � Claude Bachelard, MD � Territoi re des Terres Austr ales et Antarctiques FranÁ aises (TAAF), a nd Institut FranÁ aises Pour La Rec herche Et La Techn ologie Polaires (IF RP) � Peter Suedfeld, PhD � University of British Colum bia

French Remote Duty Stations a Dumont dUrville Terre- Adelie a Kerguelen Island Crozet island Amsterdam island ANTARCTIOVE

French Remote Duty Stations � Dumont d ’Urville, Terre -Adelie � Kerguelen Island � Crozet Island � Amsterdam Island French Remote Duty Stations � Dumont d ’Urville, Terre -Adelie � Kerguelen Island � Crozet Island � Amsterdam Island

Personnel a Four Expedition Leaders u Five Expedition Physicians

Personnel Personnel � Four Expedition Leaders Four Expedition Leaders � Five Exp Five Exp edition Physicians dition Physicians

Advantages of Content Analysis a Data are obtained unobtrusively; The entries demonstrate that subjects are attending to the task Large volumes of quantifiable data are generated by the subjects; and, The subjects benefit from their participation in the activity

Advantages of Content Analysis � Data are obtained unobtrusively; � The entries demonstrate that subjects are attending to the task; � Large volumes of quantifiable data are generat ed by the subjects; and, � The subjects benefit from their participation in the activity. Advantages of Content Analysis � Data are obtained unobtrusively; � The entries demonstrate that subjects are attending to the task; � Large volumes of quantifiable data are generat ed by the subjects; and, � The subjects benefit from their participation in the activity

Category Analysis Number of Primary and Secondary Category Assignments 75150225300375450525600 Group Interaction Outside communications Workload Recreation Leisure Adjustment Event Food Preparation O n/Mgt Equipment Safety Personnel selection Waste management Internal Communications Exercise■ Habitat Aesthetics■ Hy Personal Hygier

Category Analysis Category Analysis Group Interaction Outside Communications Workload Recreation & Leisure Medical Support Adjustment Leadership Event Food Preparation Organization/Mgt. Equipment Sleep Safety Personnel Selection Waste Management Internal Communications Exercise Habitat Aesthetics Hygiene Personal Hygiene Privacy/Personal Space Clothing Number of Primary and Secondary Category Assignments 75 150 225 300 375 450 525 60 0

Positive- Negative Analysis All diary entries were coded as positive (39%), negative (45%), or neutral (15%) Net Positivity/Negativity Calculated NPN= pPositive-pNegative Long vs Short Duration Missions Antarctic vs Insular missions Physicians vs Leaders

Positive - Negative Analysis � All diary entries were coded as positive (39%), negative (46%), or neutral (15%). � Net Positivity/Negativity Calculated: NPN = pPositive - pNegative � Long vs Short Duration Missions � Antarctic vs Insular Missions � Physicians vs Leaders Positive - Negative Analysis � All diary entries were coded as positive (39%), negative (46%), or neutral (15%). � Net Positivity/Negativity Calculated: NPN = pPositive - pNegative � Long vs Short Duration Missions � Antarctic vs Insular Missions � Physicians vs Leaders

Long ys short Duration Missions Figure 1. Overall igure 2 Group Interaction Long vs short Duration and Long vs Short Duration and All Missions Combined All Missions Combined 005 000 025 05 0.10 2nd 05 35 .10 Mission quarte Mission Quartel 一 Long-Short-o +-Long---short Combined

Long vs Short Duration Missions Short Duration Missions

Long ys short Duration Missions Figure 3. Outside Communications igure 5. Recreation Leisure Long vs Short Duration and Long vs short Duration and 11 Missions Combined All Missions Combined 0.10 0.90 000 3rd 080 0.10+ 0咒 040 40 030 50 020 0.10 60 000 Mission Quarte Mission Quarter --Long---Short- Combined ◆ Long-Short一 Combined

Long vs Short Duration Missions Short Duration Missions

Antarctic vs Insular Missions Figure 9. overall Figure 10 Group Interaction Antarctic vs Insular Stations and Antarctic vs Insularand All Missions Combined All Missions Combined 010 005 030 000 025 020 10 000 Grd Mission Quarter Mission Quarter Antarctic -Insular mbined -Antarctic -Insular Combined

Antarctic Antarctic vs Insular Missions Insular Missions