中国高校课件下载中心 》 教学资源 》 大学文库

上海交通大学:《美国公共政策制定 Public Policy-making in the U.S.》课程教学资源(PPT课件)01 An Introduction(钟杨)

文档信息
资源类别:文库
文档格式:PPT
文档页数:8
文件大小:622.5KB
团购合买:点击进入团购
内容简介
上海交通大学:《美国公共政策制定 Public Policy-making in the U.S.》课程教学资源(PPT课件)01 An Introduction(钟杨)
刷新页面文档预览

Public Policy-making in the U.S.:An Introduction 钟杨 上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院

钟杨 上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院

I.What is political science? 1.What is science? a.general laws and tendencies b.explanation (theory) c.prediction d.observable e.falsifiable

I. What is political science? 1. What is science? a. general laws and tendencies b. explanation (theory) c. prediction d. observable e. falsifiable

2.Political science a.part of social science,study and understand human behavior b.difference between traditional political studies and political science c.difference between political science and natural science

2. Political science a. part of social science, study and understand human behavior b. difference between traditional political studies and political science c. difference between political science and natural science

3.Political science in China a.short history b.most people do not do political science study and do "taxi driver political analysis"instead

3. Political science in China a. short history b. most people do not do political science study and do “taxi driver political analysis” instead

II.Comparative Politics 1.Development of comparative politics a.European studies b.Nazi and Soviet factors c.Cold War factor d.behavior revolution factor

II. Comparative Politics 1. Development of comparative politics a. European studies b. Nazi and Soviet factors c. Cold War factor d. behavior revolution factor

2.Logic of comparative politics Comparing apples and oranges? Are there general patterns in human behavior?The answer is YES. But how about每个国家国情不一样? 这是伪命题

2. Logic of comparative politics Comparing apples and oranges? Are there general patterns in human behavior? The answer is YES. But how about 每个国家国情不一样? 这是伪命题

·我的定义:比较政治学是用科学的方法,在社会科学 理论的基础上,对不同国别和地区的政治现象进行系 统的因果研究,最后的结论要再回到理论层面。简而 言之,比较政治学的逻辑就是亚当史瓦斯基(Adam Przeworski)和亨利.亭(Henry Teune)所说的,要用 理论概念作为变量取代国家的名称和符号(replacing proper names),而时间和地点都应视为潜在的变量。 比较政治的原理或逻辑其实与政治学的原理或逻辑是 样的,都是研究和解释差异或不同(variance)

 我的定义:比较政治学是用科学的方法,在社会科学 理论的基础上,对不同国别和地区的政治现象进行系 统的因果研究,最后的结论要再回到理论层面。简而 言之,比较政治学的逻辑就是亚当·史瓦斯基(Adam Przeworski)和亨利·亭(Henry Teune) 所说的,要用 理论概念作为变量取代国家的名称和符号(replacing proper names),而时间和地点都应视为潜在的变量。 比较政治的原理或逻辑其实与政治学的原理或逻辑是 一样的,都是研究和解释差异或不同(variance)

Y=X+X+X3+X+X3+..…Xn In conclusion,we need to put the study of public policy-making in the U.S.in comparative context

Y = X1+X2+X3+X4+X5+…..Xn In conclusion, we need to put the study of public policy-making in the U.S. in comparative context

已到末页,全文结束
刷新页面下载完整文档
VIP每日下载上限内不扣除下载券和下载次数;
按次数下载不扣除下载券;
注册用户24小时内重复下载只扣除一次;
顺序:VIP每日次数-->可用次数-->下载券;
相关文档