西安建筑科技大学：《水资源利用与保护》科研项目及成果_生物造粒流化床项目

Characterization of microbial communities in a fluidized-pellet-bed bioreactor by DGGE analysis Introduction As an extension of the fluidized pellet bed operation used for high rate solid-liquid separation of high concentration suspensions, the authors developed a new method to promote sludge granulation by rational utilization of inorganic coagulant and organic polymer, continuous supply of dissolved oxygen(DO), and moderate mechanical agitation in an up-flow reactor for domestic wastewater treatment. In this study, the authors used the dGGE method based on 16S rRNa gene and paid attention to the microbial diversity and community succession of pellets in the FPB bioreactor For an overall grasp of the amount and distribution of aerobic microorganisms, bacteria enumeration was also conducted Results Discussion Aerobic condition and total counts of aerobic bacteria Microbial diversity analysis through DGGE in the FPB bioreactor Fig. 4 shows the finger printing obtained by dGGE for all the samples Fig. 1 showed the result of Do consumption for biodegradation. It can be According to the principle of DGGE analysis, each electrophoresis strip seen from the Do profile that the liquid was with a Do >1.0 mg/L as h presents an independent distinct fragment, and each fragment 40 cm, a Do between 0.23 and 1.0 mg/L as 40110 cm. Therefore, the FPB variety of microbial species, and stronger signal indicates a greater bioreactor is generally under an aerobic condition especially in its bottom amount of organisms. It is recognized from Fig. 4 that there are 23 section microbial species(17 common +6 specific) in the bottom(h=10cm), 21 (17 common 4 specific)in the middle(h=60cm) and 20(17 common +3 specific) in the top sections of the FPB bioreactor. The comparability of the microbial communities can thus be evaluated as 83. 1%, indicating a very stable microbial structure throughout the FPB bioreactor. Contrarily, the succession of microbial communities in the vertical direction of the FPB Fig. 1 DO profile along the FPB height 1.0E+8 Fig 3 Agarose ge Fig. 4 DGGE finger printing al electrophoregrams of the genome cluster analysis Results (1, 2, 3 DNA, PCR products and purified samples of granular sludge from the PCR products. (1, 2, 3: samples of FPB at 10cm, 60cm, 110cm, ranular sludge from the FPB at 10, pectively: O": specific strip; 60, 110 cm, respectively) "△": co m mon strip.) Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA Fig 2 Total counts of aerobic bacteria along sequence similarity the height of FPB bioreactor Fig. 2 shows the results of enumeration of total heterotrophic bacteria in per unit weight of sludge in the FPB. At the bottom section, i.e. h=10cm the total aerobic bacteria count was as high as 9.5X 107 count/g, and it hactenuAY212722) kept the same order in the upward direction though there were slight AB023660) decreases to 6.9x 107 at h=60cm. and to 4 2x107 at h=110cm. The difference of Do concentration along the vertical direction did not affect D286359 the growth of aerobic bacteria so much IcntaAF1I072) DNA extraction and PCR amplification 277.5 From each of the granular sludge samples collected from the FPB bioreactor, the genome DNA was extracted by chemical cleavage method Fig 5 Phylogenetic tree of the OTUs and their relatives among and then amplified by PCR with universal primers of Eubacteria and Actinobacteria Archaebacteria(530F and 1490R)to 16s rRNA gene. As can be seen in (Sequences are aligned with Clustal W, and the distance and number Fig. 3a, the genome DNA extracted from all the samples were at a level represent the nucleotide substitutions. Numbers in parentheses represent larger than 14 kb, indicating that the genome DNA is unabridged. After the sequences accession number in GenBank PCR amplification, 16s rRNA fragments with size of 1 kb were obtained As a result of phylogenitic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequence from each of the samples(Fig. 3b). Although certain non-special products similarity, the 18 OTUs are all found to belong to Eubacteria of which 11 or appeared in the electrophoregrams possibly due to interference from the 61 are Proteobacteria. 3 or 17 are Actinobacteria. 2 or 11% are low universal primers and low purity of DNA samples, they disappeared after G+c gram-positive bacteria and the remaining 2 or 11% belong to other gel recovery purification (Fig. 3c) bacteria branches Conclusions This paper illustrated the characteristics of microbial communities in the FPB bioreactor through DGGE analysis and aerobic bacteria enumeration. As a result, 17 common microbial species were identified from the granular sludge sampled from the bottom, middle and top sections of the FPB. The comparability of the microbial communities in the three samples was 83. 1%. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis results revealed that the 18 OTUs obtained in the DGGE finger printing all belong to the domain of Eubacteria Acknowledgement: This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China( Grant No. 50578132)

Characterization of microbial communities in a fluidized-pellet-bed bioreactor by DGGE analysis As an extension of the fluidized pellet bed operation used for high rate solid-liquid separation of high concentration suspensions, the authors developed a new method to promote sludge granulation by rational utilization of inorganic coagulant and organic polymer, continuous supply of dissolved oxygen (DO), and moderate mechanical agitation in an up-flow reactor for domestic wastewater treatment. In this study, the authors used the DGGE method based on 16S rRNA gene and paid attention to the microbial diversity and community succession of pellets in the FPB bioreactor. For an overall grasp of the amount and distribution of aerobic microorganisms, bacteria enumeration was also conducted. Introduction Results & Discussion Fig. 2 shows the results of enumeration of total heterotrophic bacteria in per unit weight of sludge in the FPB. At the bottom section, i.e. h=10cm, the total aerobic bacteria count was as high as 9.5×107 count/g, and it kept the same order in the upward direction though there were slight decreases to 6.9×107 at h=60cm, and to 4.2×107 at h=110cm. The difference of DO concentration along the vertical direction did not affect the growth of aerobic bacteria so much. Conclusions Fig. 1 showed the result of DO consumption for biodegradation. It can be seen from the DO profile that the liquid was with a DO > 1.0 mg/L as h 110 cm. Therefore, the FPB bioreactor is generally under an aerobic condition especially in its bottom section. This paper illustrated the characteristics of microbial communities in the FPB bioreactor through DGGE analysis and aerobic bacteria enumeration. As a result, 17 common microbial species were identified from the granular sludge sampled from the bottom, middle and top sections of the FPB. The comparability of the microbial communities in the three samples was 83.1%. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis results revealed that the 18 OTUs obtained in the DGGE finger printing all belong to the domain of Eubacteria. Fig. 1 DO profile along the FPB height Aerobic condition and total counts of aerobic bacteria in the FPB bioreactor DNA extraction and PCR amplification Microbial diversity analysis through DGGE Fig. 4 shows the finger printing obtained by DGGE for all the samples. According to the principle of DGGE analysis, each electrophoresis strip represents an independent distinct fragment, and each fragment represents a microbial species. Larger number of strips is an indication of variety of microbial species, and stronger signal indicates a greater amount of organisms. It is recognized from Fig. 4 that there are 23 microbial species (17 common + 6 specific) in the bottom (h=10cm), 21 (17 common + 4 specific) in the middle (h=60cm) and 20 (17 common + 3 specific) in the top sections of the FPB bioreactor. The comparability of the microbial communities can thus be evaluated as 83.1%, indicating a very stable microbial structure throughout the FPB bioreactor. Contrarily, the succession of microbial communities in the vertical direction of the FPB bioreactor is not obvious. Fig. 4 DGGE finger printing and cluster analysis Results (1, 2, 3: samples of granular sludge from the FPB at 10cm, 6 0cm, 11 0cm, respectively; "○": specific strip; " Δ " : c o m m o n s t r i p . ) As a result of phylogenitic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequence similarity, the 18 OTUs are all found to belong to Eubacteria of which 11 or 61 % are Proteobacteria, 3 or 17 % are Actinobacteria, 2 or 11% are low G+C gram-positive bacteria and the remaining 2 or 11% belong to other bacteria branches. Fig. 2 Total counts of aerobic bacteria along the height of FPB bioreactor From each of the granular sludge samples collected from the FPB bioreactor, the genome DNA was extracted by chemical cleavage method and then amplified by PCR with universal primers of Eubacteria and Archaebacteria (530F and 1490R) to 16s rRNA gene. As can be seen in Fig. 3a, the genome DNA extracted from all the samples were at a level larger than 14 kb, indicating that the genome DNA is unabridged. After PCR amplification, 16s rRNA fragments with size of 1 kb were obtained from each of the samples (Fig. 3b). Although certain non-special products appeared in the electrophoregrams possibly due to interference from the universal primers and low purity of DNA samples, they disappeared after gel recovery purification (Fig. 3c). Fig. 3 Agarose gel electrophoregrams of the genome DNA, PCR products and purified PCR products. (1, 2, 3: samples of granular sludge from the FPB at 10, 60, 110 cm, respectively) (a) (b) (c) Height of fluidized bed 9.5E+07 6.9E+07 4.2E+07 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08 1.0E+09 10cm 60cm 110cm Aerobic bacteria count (1/g) Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequence similarity Fig. 5 Phylogenetic tree of the OTUs and their relatives among Actinobacteria. (Sequences are aligned with Clustal W, and the distance and number represent the nucleotide substitutions. Numbers in parentheses represent the sequences accession number in GenBank). Uncultured bacterium(AY976349) Uncultured bacterium(AY982499) Band 1-g S.maxima(X76650) Uncultured bacterium(AF371837) Bacillaceae bacterium(AF513473) Cytophaga sp.(X85210) Uncultured bacterium(AY212722) Band 1-j Flavobacterium columnare(AB023660) Flavobacterium sp.(AM110999) Clostridium disporicum(Y18176) S.ventriculi(X76649) Bacillus thuringiensis(DQ286359) Band 3-c Sarcina ventriculi(AF110272) Band 1-f Bacillus sp.(DQ314542) Bacillus sp.(AY124766) Bacillus cereus(DQ314542) Bacillus sp.(AJ746155) 277.5 250 200 150 100 50 0 Uncultured bacterium(AY976349) Uncultured bacterium(AY982499) Band 1-g S.maxima(X76650) Uncultured bacterium(AF371837) Bacillaceae bacterium(AF513473) Cytophaga sp.(X85210) Uncultured bacterium(AY212722) Band 1-j Flavobacterium columnare(AB023660) Flavobacterium sp.(AM110999) Clostridium disporicum(Y18176) S.ventriculi(X76649) Bacillus thuringiensis(DQ286359) Band 3-c Sarcina ventriculi(AF110272) Band 1-f Bacillus sp.(DQ314542) Bacillus sp.(AY124766) Bacillus cereus(DQ314542) Bacillus sp.(AJ746155) 277.5 250 200 150 100 50 0 Acknowledgement: This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50578132) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 1 2 3 4 DO (mg/L) Height of fluidized bed (cm) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 1 2 3 4 DO (mg/L) Height of fluidized bed (cm)